<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=567935313412446&ev=PageView&noscript=1"/>

Report Highlights: 

Brazil is the second largest producer of biotech crops in the world. Post forecasts an increase of ten percent in the area planted to biotech crops during the upcoming 2013/14 Brazilian crop year (Oct 2013 through Sep 2014). The increase is mostly attributed to the higher use of biotech corn due to the increase in approvals of new biotech corn events in Brazil and greater availability of subsidized credit for farmers. Post has also updated other sections of the report to reflect new information from trade and government sources. 

Section I. Executive Summary: 

Bilateral agricultural trade between Brazil and United States reached US$ 4.6 billion in 2012, down 16 percent from the previous record year. Brazil exported to the United States US$ 4.1 billion and imported from the United States US$ 500 million. 

United States agricultural exports to Brazil are primarily agricultural commodities required to meet local shortfalls. Brazil is a major producer and exporter of agricultural products such as soybeans, cotton, sugar, cocoa, coffee, frozen concentrated orange juice, beef, poultry, pork, tobacco, hides and skins, fruits and nuts, fish products, and wood products. As a result, the United States and Brazil are often competitors in third markets, while the United States is a major destination for Brazil’s exports of sugar, coffee, tobacco, orange juice, and wood products. 

Brazil is responding to the higher world food prices and possible food shortages by increasing agricultural production. A record R$ 136 billion (US$ 62 billion) in credit lines at subsidized interest rates was announced in early July 2013 for the upcoming 2013/2014 crop season (Oct 2013 – Sep 2014, up 18 percent from last year). These farm aid packages for agricultural production combined with the higher use of agricultural technology have consolidated the agricultural sector in Brazil. Grain production increased from 60 million metric tons in 1991 to 190 million during the current crop year, up 216 percent. In the same period, the cultivated area increased 30 percent from 38.5 million hectares in 1991 to currently 50 million hectares. 

According to commodity analysts, these policy measures combined with record world commodity prices are likely to contribute to the continued use of modern production technology such as biotech events in the next crop year. According to the Ministry of Science and Technology (MCT), Brazil is a major leader in agricultural biotech research, and is the second largest plant biotech producer in the world, after the United States. 

Chapter 1: PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY 

PART A: PRODUCTION AND TRADE 

a) Product Development 

Several Brazilian and multinational seed companies and public sector research institutions are working on the development of various GE plants. Currently, there are several biotech crops in the pipeline waiting for commercial approval, of which the most important are sugar cane, potatoes, papaya, eucalyptus, rice and citrus. Except for sugar cane, most of these crops are under early stages of developments and approvals are not expected within the next five years. 

b) Commercial Production 

As of July 2013, there are 38 GE events approved for commercial cultivation in Brazil, of which 20 events for corn, 12 for cotton, five for soybeans, and one for dry edible beans. Ten years since the first commercial approval of biotech soybeans in Brazil, the total area with the GE crops during the last crop season (2012/13) reached 37 million hectares, which places Brazil as the second largest producer of GE crops in the world. Herbicide tolerance traits leads the adoption rate with 69 percent of the total area planted, followed by insect resistance with 16 percent and stacked genes with 15 percent. 

Soybeans: During the 2012/13 soybean crop season (Oct 1, 2012 though Sep 30, 2013), the area planted with GE soybean is estimated at nearly 25 million hectares, up 14 percent from the previous crop season. Trade sources indicate that the adoption rate of GE soybean seeds reached 88 percent of the total soybean area. 

Corn: The area planted to GE corn (both winter and summer crops) also increased by 14 percent and is estimated at 12 million hectares. The adoption rate for the winter corn crop was 88 percent and for the summer corn crop was 65 percent. 

Cotton: The area planted to GE cotton during 2012/2013 crop season is estimated at 550,000 hectares and the adoption rate at 50 percent. 

GE dry edible beans: Although approved in 2011, GE dry edible beans are expected to be commercially cultivated only in 2014/2015 crop season. 

c) Exports 

Brazil is one of the leading exporters of biotech soybeans, corn and cotton. China is the main importer of Brazilian biotech soybeans and cotton, followed by the European Union. Brazil is also considered the largest exporter of conventional soybeans. 

d) Imports 

According to Brazilian legislation, only GE events approved by the National Technical Commission of Biosafety (CTNBio) for commercial production in Brazil can be imported. Imports are approved by CTNBio on a case-by-case basis. In order to meet shortfalls in production, Brazil imports GE corn from Argentina and GE cotton from the United States. 

e) Food Aid Recipient Country. 

Brazil is not a food aid recipient and it is not likely to be in the near future. Moreover Brazil is a source of food aid for some countries in Africa and Central America, mostly for rice and dry beans, which are currently not biotech products. 

PART B: POLICY 

a) Regulatory Framework 

The regulatory framework for agricultural biotechnology in Brazil is outlined in Law 11,105 of 2005, modified by Law 11,460 of 2007 and Decree Number 5,591 of 2006. There are two main governing bodies that regulate agricultural biotechnology in Brazil. 

1) The National Biosafety Council (CNBS, in Portuguese). This council falls under the Office of the President and is responsible for the formulation and implementation of the national biosafety policy (PNB, in Portuguese) in Brazil. It establishes the principles and directives of administrative actions for the federal agencies involved in biotechnology. It evaluates socio-economic implications and national interests regarding approval for commercial use of biotech products. No safety considerations are evaluated by CNBS. Under the presidency of the Chief of Staff of the Office of the President, CNBS is comprised of 11 cabinet ministers and needs a minimum quorum of 6 ministers to approve any relevant issue. 

2) The National Technical Commission of Biosafety (CTNBio, in Portuguese) was initially established in 1995 under the first Brazilian Biosafety law (Law # 8,974). Under the current law, CTNBio was expanded from 18 to 27 members to include official representatives from 9 ministries of the federal government, 12 specialists with scientific and technical knowledge from 4 different areas including animal, plant, environment, and health (3 specialists from each area), and 6 other specialists from other areas such as consumer defense and family farming. Members of CTNBio are elected for two years with a possibility of being reelected for an additional two years. CTNBio is under the Ministry of Science and Technology. All technical related issues are debated and approved under CTNBio. Imports of any agricultural commodity for animal feed or for further processing, or any ready-to-consume food products, and pet food containing biotech events must be pre-approved by CTNBio. Approvals are on a case-by-case basis and they are indefinite. For additional information on CTNBio, please see GAIN BR 5632. 

Law 11,460 of March 21, 2007, changed article 11 of Law 11,105 of March 24, 2005 and established that a simple majority of votes is needed out 27 total voters on CTNBio’s board to approve new biotechnology products. 

On June 18, 2008 the National Biosafety Council (CNBS) decided that it will only review administrative appeals that are of national interest, involving social or economic issues, as per the Brazilian Biotechnology Law. CNBS will not evaluate technical decisions on biotech events that are approved by the National Technical Commission of Biosafety (CTNBio). The Council considers all approvals of biotech events by CTNBio as conclusive. This important decision, along with the change in majority voting, eliminates a major barrier for approval of biotech events in Brazil. 

c) Field Testing 

The National Technical Commission of Biosafety (CTNBio) is responsible for granting prior approval for all field trials in Brazil. The technology provider must obtain a Certificate of Quality in Bio Safety (CQBs) from CTNBio to perform field-testing. All providers must create an Internal Biosafety Commission (CIBio), and indicate for each specific project a principal researcher, defined in CTNBio’s regulations as the “Principal Technical Officer”. 

d) Stacked Event Approvals 

Stacked events follow the same approval process as single events and are treated as new events. In Brazil, it is estimated that stacked genes accounts for 15 percent of the total area in Brazil planted to GE crops. 

e) Additional Requirement 

Once an event is approved by the CTNBio, it requires no further review in perpetuity. 

f) Coexistence 

Law 11,105 of March 2005 established the legal framework under which biotech crops can be produced and marketed in Brazil. Conventional or non-biotech crops are produced throughout the country with agricultural zoning and environmental limitations mostly applicable in the Amazon region. 

Law 9,456 of April 25, 1997, called Plant Variety Protection Law, establishes the legal framework for registration of both biotech and non-biotech seeds, but the law does not favor one over the other. 

Decree 2,366 of November 5, 1997, established the National Plant Varieties Protection Service under the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Food Supply (MAPA) and regulates the registration of biotech and non-biotech seeds. 

Normative Instruction # 04/07 issued by the CTNBio establishes rules, specifically for biotech corn, regarding the coexistence of biotech and non-biotech crops in Brazil. 

g) Labeling 

On April 24, 2003, the President of Brazil published in Brazil’s Federal Register (Diario Oficial) Executive Order # 4,680/03 establishing a tolerance limit of one percent for food and food ingredients destined for human or animal consumption containing or being produced through biotech events. The Executive Order also declared that consumers need to be informed of the biotech nature of the product. 

On December 26, 2003 the Ministry of Justice published in Brazil's Diario Oficial, Directive # 2,658/03 approving the regulations for the use of the transgenic logo. It applies for biotech products for either human or animal consumption with biotech content above one percent. The requirement became effective March 27, 2004. 

On April 2, 2004, the Civil Cabinet of the Presidency published Normative Instruction Number 1, signed by 4 cabinet ministers (Civil Cabinet, Justice, Agriculture, and Health) that established the conditions by which Directive 2,658/03 will enforce the labeling of products containing biotech events above the one percent limit. In addition to the federal agencies, Normative Instruction # 1 also authorizes the state and municipal consumer defense officials to enforce the new labeling requirements. 

h) Trade Barriers 

Brazil allows imports of biotech products on a case by case basis. All imports of GE products must have the pre-approval of CTNBio. Approvals take into consideration food safety, toxicology and environmental aspects, and are generally science based. After approval is granted, there are no further trade barriers. 

i) Intellectual Property Rights 

The new Biosafety Law, which provides a clear regulatory framework for the research and marketing of new biotechnology crops in the country, has encouraged Brazil’s federal government to embrace and protect new technologies that benefit agriculture. 

Multinational companies such as Monsanto, Syngenta and BASF, have licensing agreements with EMBRAPA (the Brazilian Agriculture and Livestock Research Enterprise, linked to MAPA to develop plant biotech crops, mostly for soybeans, corn and cotton. 

In general, technology providers negotiate at the beginning of the new crop year payment agreements with individual Brazilian states and farmer associations to collect royalty fees. Monsanto also pursues an export-licensing scheme to collect royalties on soybean and product shipments at ports of destination in countries where Monsanto has a patent on the RR soybean technology. 

According to trade sources, Monsanto plans to charge Brazilian farmers for the use of the technology of INTACTA RR2 PRO a fee of R$115.00 per hectare (US$ 57.50 per hectare). According to Monsanto, this new event will yield a gain in income to the Brazilian farmer of R$346.00 (US$173.00) per hectare, using the exchange rate of 2 Reais to one dollar. 

Monsanto also obtained an injunction by the state court in Rio Grande do Sul against a decision made by a local judge until the case is argued in the state court. According to Monsanto, royalties are being collected normally in that state. 

j) Cartagena Protocol Ratification 

In November 2003, Brazil ratified the United Nations Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (under the UN Convention on Biological Diversity). With few exceptions, the Government of Brazil (GOB) is supportive of the positions advocated by the U.S. Government regarding the liability and redress provisions under the supplementary agreement to the Cartagena Biosafety Protocol. One notable exception is that the GOB considers the provisions regarding treatment of non-parties to be already closed. The GOB is also opposed to strict liability, but agrees to use a narrow definition of damage and supports the idea of a limited narrow definition of operator. The GOB is also opposed to the mandatory use of insurance or other financial instruments for the shipment of living modified organisms (LMOs). 

k) International Treaties/Fora: 

Like the United States, Brazil promotes science-based standards and definitions in international fora with an aim to remove unscientific sanitary and technical barriers to trade. Brazil supports labeling of GE plant products in international fora. 

l) Related Issues: 

Brazil continues to be a reliable partner with the United States in conducting joint outreach in third countries. Global food security and the particular role of biotechnology therein, is a driving force behind the enhanced collaboration. 

m) Monitoring and Testing: 

Monitoring of GE crop events is conducted by the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply (MAPA). According to the legislation in force, MAPA oversees inspection of these events intended for agriculture, animal use, and related-fields in the agro-industry. The Ministry of Health through its National Surveillance Agency (ANVISA) also inspects the events for toxicology, while the Ministry of the Environment through the Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA) monitors and inspects the events and their impact on the environment. 

The Provider’s CIBios are an essential component for monitoring and testing the work of genetic engineering, manipulation, production and transportation of GMOs and to enforce regulations on Biosafety. 

n) Low Level Presence policy 

Brazil has a zero tolerance policy for unapproved GE food and crop events. 

PART C: MARKETING 

a) Market Acceptance 

Acceptance of biotech crops in Brazil is strong among producers. According to the Confederation of Brazilian Agriculture and Livestock (CNA), the latest full survey among Brazilian farmers carried out in 2010 showed an 80 percent acceptance rate of biotech crops. 

However, acceptance is low among meat processors and the food processing industry. These groups fear the marketing campaign against their products sponsored by environmental and consumer groups, mostly in the European Union. Although, tests conducted by the groups showed a minimum of biotech residues in several consumer ready products, large Brazilian retailers also are reluctant to accept biotech products, especially the French-owned hypermarkets located throughout Brazil. 

The Brazilian Food Industry Association indicated that 74 percent of Brazilian consumers have never heard of biotech (GMO) products. In general, Brazilian consumers are disengaged from the biotechnology debate as they are more concerned about price, quality and the expiration date of their foods. However, a small number of consumers more oriented towards organic agriculture and sustainable production methods avoid GE plant products and their derivatives. 

b) Public/Private Opinions: 

The marketing campaign “Brazil Better without Transgenic” is against the use of GE crops in Brazil. It is sponsored by Greenpeace and supported by certain environmental and consumer groups, including government officials within the Ministry of Environment, some political parties, the Catholic Church, and the Landless Movement. The campaign against GE plant and products in Brazil is more effective among large retailers and food processors than among Brazilian consumers in general. 

c) Marketing Studies: 

The following organizations offer articles and studies in their home pages home pages regarding Brazil specific studies on the marketing of GE plants and plant products. All the studies are in Portuguese: 

National Association of Biosecurity (Anbio)

Biotechnology Information Council (CIB) 

Brazilian Food Industry Association (Abia) 

PART D: CAPACITY BUILDING AND OUTREACH 

a) Activities 

1. Biotechnology Workshop, August 20-21, 2002 for a select group of Brazilian scientists from various ministries, universities, and scientific foundations; 

2. Brazilian Congressional visit to the United States in 2004 with representatives from select Brazilian NGOs and institutes; 

3. Brazilian Corn Growers visit in 2008 to the United States with selected representatives from the House Agricultural Committee; 

4. Trilateral conference held in Accra, Ghana in 2011; 

5. FAS/Brasilia and Washington New Technologies Division FAS posts in Cairo, Nairobi, Pretoria, Maputo, and Lagos, together with State, Embrapa, the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply (MAPA), the Brazilian Technical Biosafety Commission (CTNBio), and the Brazilian Development Agency (ABC) supported the visit of a delegation of 20 African regulators, scientists, and farmers who visited Brazil to learn more about Brazilian and U.S. experiences with agricultural biotechnology. Brazilian and U.S. biotech experts led discussions on regulatory, scientific, and communications issues related to agricultural biotechnology. African participants posed many excellent questions which sparked lively discussions. After the seminar component in Brasilia, which took place at Embrapa headquarters, the African delegation members traveled to Goias to visit farms and acquaint themselves with biotech varieties of corn and cotton. The delegation also attended a local farm exposition. 

b) Strategies and Need 

There are opportunities for trilateral cooperation with Brazil to support agricultural biotechnology in sub-Saharan Africa and Central America. 

Chapter 2: ANIMAL BIOTECHNOLOGY 

PART E: PRODUCTION AND TRADE 

a) Biotechnology Product Development 

Brazil is the second largest producer of GE plants in the world, but research and application of animal biotechnology, including animal cloning is nascent. Brazil has had experience with GE animal research for over 10 years. EMBRAPA has been successful with GE dairy cattle. Embrapa has research in the pipeline on recombinant proteins: two calves born in 2013 are part of this research. Another project is GE technology to improve beef cattle health and also to increase cattle weight. Recently, the state of Ceará produced two GE goats that yield higher levels of a human antimicrobial protein proven effective in treating diarrhea in young pigs. The research demonstrates the potential for food products from GE animals to benefit human health. This project is in cooperation with the University of California at Davis. 

Brazil has a well developed research system for cloned animals under the national coordination of the EMBRAPA. Cloning research started in the late 1990s in Brazil, mostly focused on cattle. In March 2001 Brazil was successful in cloning a Simmental heifer, called "Vitoria." The second clone was born in 2003 from cells of a Holstein cow called "Lenda da EMBRAPA". The third clone was obtained from a native cow called “Junqueira” in April 2005 that is from an endangered species list. 

There is no development being carried out at present that would likely lead to a commercial release of GE animals within the next five years. 

b) Commercial production 

Brazil does not commercially produce GE animals. However, commercial Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer (SCNT) cloning in Brazil is practiced by a small number of companies, mostly under a partnership with EMBRAPA. These companies have only cloned cattle for use as elite show and breeding animals. And, since May 2009, MAPA changed its regulation to allow the genetic registration of cloned cattle under the Brazilian Zebu Cattle Association (ABCZ), since this breed of animal (Brazilian Zebu, similar to the Brahman in the United States) represents about 90 percent of the cattle base in Brazil. 

Because of this change in regulation, the first auction of a cloned animal was conducted in November of 2009 and sold for the price of US$900,000. Trade sources expect that with the possibility of genetic registration, cloned bovine animals will expand in the near future. The average cost of these animals is estimated at one million dollars. Products of these animals can not be sold in Brazil since there is no specific legislation yet. See policy section below. 

Brazil has 14 GE vaccines released by CTNBio for commercial use. 

c) Biotechnology Exports 

None for commercial use. 

d) Biotechnology Imports 

None for commercial use. 

PART F: POLICY 

a) Regulation 

GE animals and GE vaccines are under the same legislation as GE plants and subject to the approval of the National Technical Commission of Biosafety (CTNBio). However, no GE animals have been subject to CTNbio approval as research is in its early stages. 

However, animal cloning follows a different policy. Currently, there is no systematic regulatory framework in place in Brazil either at federal or state levels related to cloned animals and their products. A draft bill is currently before Brazil’s Senate (# 73, dated March 7, 2007), that proposes to regulate the cloning of animals, including wild animals and their offspring. 

The draft bill proposes to make MAPA responsible for the registration of all institutions, both private and public, that conduct research on cloned animals, including the authorization for commercial sales and imports of cloned animals for genetic or food purposes. 

Since there is no specific regulation in place for cloned animals and their products, MAPA cannot authorize any imports of cloned animals or their products (meat or dairy products) to Brazil. The same applies for the progeny of cloned animals and their products. 

Under the Draft Bill #73, the authorization for imports of cloned animals and their products will be provided within 60 days after MAPA receives all documentation from the exporting company, such as origin of the animal, characteristics of the animal, destination of the animal in Brazil, purpose of imports (genetic or food). 

The proposed legislation also differentiates between two types of authorization for imports of cloned animals and their products: a) for pharmaceutical or therapeutic use, the authorization will be under Brazil’s Food and Drug Agency equivalent ANVISA, under the Ministry of Health (MS); and, b) when the cloned animal and their products involve genetically modified organisms the authorization will fall under the National Technical Commission of biotechnology (CTNBio), under the Ministry of Science and Technology. 

Draft Bill #73 does not make reference to labeling of products derived from cloned animals. However, political analysts expect strong pressures from anti-biotech groups in Brazil to apply the same principles of Brazil’s Biotech Law and use Brazil’s Consumer Defense Code to pressure the government for a specific label for cloned animals and their products. 

b) Labeling and Traceability 

The same regulations and laws and administrative bodies apply to GE animals, although some specific requirements such as labeling and traceability have not yet been developed for GE animals. 

The regulatory framework for animal cloning is under review in Congress and will likely fall under the authority of MAPA. There are no specifics in the draft legislation for animal cloning regarding labeling and traceability for products of animal cloning. 

Brazilian consumer law applies for all products of GE plants, GE animals or animal cloning in terms of basic and general information about the product for the consumer. 

c) Trade Barriers 

All imports of GE animal products must obtain prior approval from CTNBio. Approvals take into consideration food safety, toxicology and environmental aspects, and are generally science based. Imports are on a case by case. Once approval is granted, there are no further trade barriers anticipated. 

d) Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) 

Brazilian Biosafety Law, which provides a clear regulatory framework for the research and marketing of new biotechnology crops in the country, has encouraged Brazil’s federal government to embrace and protect new technologies that benefit agriculture. Since there are no commercial releases of GE animals and products, this area of IPR has not been tested. 

e) International Treaties/Fora

Brazil is a member of both the Codex Alimentarius (CODEX) and the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE). Brazil is also a signatory to parts of the Cartagena Protocol. 

PART G: MARKETING 

a) Market Acceptance 

Since there have been no commercial releases of GE animals and their derived products or livestock clones, and their offspring of clones, this area has not been tested in terms of consumer and retailer acceptance or rejection. However, Brazilian cattle producers are enthusiastic about the potential of this new technology. 

b) Public/Private Opinions 

Brazilian cattle producers are strong advocates for this new technology and support the approval of animal cloning regulation in Congress and that the authority for this new area fall under the auspices of MAPA. 

PART H: CAPACITY BUILDING AND OUTREACH 

a) Activities 

None 

b) Strategies and Needs 

An activity has been proposed for FY 2014 for GE animals and cloning. In 2014, private companies and the governments of the United States and Brazil are planning to conduct a workshop on GE animals in Brasil. Targeting selected countries as presenters and participants, the workshop will bring together technology providers, researchers, policy makers and supply chain representatives to share knowledge and discuss strategies for moving forward to the development, legislation, regulation and marketing of animals and their derived products

PARIS GRAIN DAY 2018

III АГРАРНИЙ ЕКСПОРТНИЙ ФОРУМ